Keeping Animals In Zoos Free Essays - StudyMode.
In general, zoos are seen as some sort of alternative to a natural environment for the animals. Let’s find out if it’s true by means of examining the pros and cons of the zoos. It is an important debate whether animals should be kept in the zoos or not. Some say that it is necessary to capture them in order to protect from poachers.
On the other hand, keeping animals in zoos is harmful for them. The animals are forced to live in a unnatural habitat. There is not enough living space in the zoos, when often makes animals unhappy and restless. It is also true that, some animals do not proliferate in zoos.
Keeping Animals In Zoos Zoos argue that they save endangered species and educate the public, but animal rights activists believe the costs outweigh the benefits, and the violation of the rights of the individual animals is unjustifiable. Roadside zoos, petting zoos, and smaller animal exhibitors tend to keep the animals in smaller pens or cages.
Lastly, keeping animals in zoos is an essential strategy to maintain and sustain several species especially the endangered ones. Zoos safeguard rare and valuable species from hunters and other cruel individuals. The cons include the confinement of animals in zoos makes them suffer from adverse impacts on their psychology.
The opponents of zoos argue that it is not keeping animals away from their natural habitat and having them in small cages changes their living instincts thereby breaking the ecological balance. This is a conscious concern that is worth giving a second thought.
Zoos are the places where several animals are kept. Some groups of people consider that zoos should be banned in the 21st century as they snatch the freedom of animals. However, I disagree with the given notion because of the benefits zoos provide such as protection of animals, education and entertainment, lastly maintenance of ecological balance.
Common Problems With Zoos 1. Keeping animals in cages is cruel, and we don’t have the right. Yep, captivity is certainly cruel to an extent.
Zoos are the places where animals are kept. Some people argue that animals shall not be kept in zoos as they deserve freedom. Zoos cannot provide them with enough space, therefore, they cannot run around so as to grow up freely. On the other hand, some people argue that animals should be kept in zoos.
Keeping animals in zoos is seen as an infringement of animal rights. By confining these animals, they are unable to mingle freely with their mates as the case would be in a natural setting. These animals are psychologically distressed as a result of being in a controlled environment with a lot of human interference.
Another argument against animals being kept in zoos and safari parks is that if the animal is taken out of it's natural habitat for too long and then put back not only will it have lost many of it's natural skills, but it will usually be killed by other animals as well.
Animals should be kept in zoo because in the wild they have hunt and find food. In the zoos they get daily food and are cared for. Animals should be kept in zoos because all the animals would be extinct by now if it wasn’t for zoos. Animals should be treated with great respect.
First of all, animals kept in zoos get a professional medical care, which is unavailable in their natural habitat. Secondly, animals have plenty of food. They usually get two or three meals every day. Moreover, animals are safe in zoos.
Before we consider the reasons that are usually given for the survival of zoos, we should see that there is a moral presumption against keeping wild animals in captivity. What this involves, after all, is taking animals out of their native habitats, transporting them great distances and keeping them in alien environments in which their liberty is severely restricted. It is surely true that in.
Another argument against zoos is that animals in captivity have limited space. They do not have the space they would in their natural habitat (Zamir, 2006).This has recently been brought to the public’s attention with news media stories of trainers, such as those who interacted with whales, being killed. The argument is that whales in their natural habitat swim many miles a day but are.
In the article, Arguments for and against zoos by Doris Lin she explains “zoos help rehabilitate wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer want or are no longer able to care for. (Lin)” They highlight a variety of animals and wildlife, but in a closed and confined setting. Each animal has it’s designed area that they can freely roam, but once they move past or attempt to.
Moreover, keeping animals in zoos teach people that it is okay to lock up and make animals miserable for their personal gain. Therefore, by gaining pleasure and entertainment from making animals suffer is a horrible lesson to learn. Proponents of keeping animals in zoos argue that zoos offer the best forms of protection for animals.